This blog includes text and images drawn from historical sources that may contain material that is offensive or harmful. We strive to accurately represent the past while being sensitive to the needs and concerns of our audience. If you have any feedback to share on this topic, please either comment on a relevant post, or use our Ask Us form to contact us.
This Week in Princeton History for March 30-April 5
In this week’s installment of our recurring series bringing you the history of Princeton University and its faculty, students, and alumni, the library receives a new gift of F. Scott Fitzgerald correspondence, a campus publication rails against women’s suffrage, and more.
March 31, 1967— Charles Scribner Jr. ’43 presents the Princeton University Library with Charles Scribner’s Sons complete correspondence with F. Scott Fitzgerald, Class of 1917.
April 1, 1871—Today’s issue of Princeton’s College World rails against women’s involvement in politics and women’s suffrage. “It is generally advocated by women who have long since banished all the hopes which they once entertained of becoming faithful and loving wives, and who have for a long time been deprived of those charms of youth and comeliness which may have once marked them as attractive members of society. … the cause is utterly worthless, indeed, to a great measure pernicious, since it would overthrow the benefits arising from our present form of government which has been established after so much labor and bloodshed.” College World urges women to take care of orphans instead.
April 5, 1943—Beginning today, all regularly scheduled University exercises, except Sunday Chapel services, will shift forward 10 minutes. This is necessary to allow the Army trainees enough time to assemble and march to class in formation after breakfast.
For the previous installment in this series, click here.
Fact check: We always strive for accuracy, but if you believe you see an error, please contact us.
2 responses to “This Week in Princeton History for March 30-April 5”
[…] ← Previous […]
Perkins sure did get his money back! Thanks for the reminder of what Elm looked like in my day (1960s) – it was basically the same.